Who would have thought boatbuilding would involve so much math?
I was reading Glen L. Witts Boatbuilding With Plywood and realized what should have been obvious to me: The waterline of a boat is calculated beforehand. I guess it makes sense that boatbuilders dont guesstimate their designs only to drop their boats into the water and see what happens. On top of that, many of the handling characteristics of a boat are built into the design, including balance.
With our cabin shifted back from the center, this would shift the balance toward the back. Add to that the weight of the motor and fuel and we have a potential problem. So far, Ive been assuming symmetrical bow and stern as many barge boats feature, but in order to increase buoyancy in back and shift the center of buoyancy forward, I can reduce the rake in back to get more of the hull in the water there. This explains some of the barge boat that did feature a smaller stern rake. How would I go about calculating that? That is something I will have to think about.
But as an interesting exercise, I can calculate the waterline height as a function of the rake angles, length and width of the boat, and overall loaded weight of the boat.
I had to go back to my algebra and trigonometry reference books to look up how tangent and the quadratic equation worked. The last equation gives us the waterline height hw as a function of
We then solve for the unknown and get an equation in a quadratic form (the forth one from the bottom). So we use the quadradic equation (which Ive always hated) to solve for hw.
Well say the boat is 8 foot (96 inches) wide, the length is 20 foot (240 inches), and the height from the bottom to the deck is 2 feet (24 inches). The bow rake angle is 45° and the stern rake is a modest 10°.
So plugging in the numbers, and taking the plus-or-minus of the quadratic formula into account, I get:
Checking my math... ah I forgot a negative sign! New solutions:
Read More..

With our cabin shifted back from the center, this would shift the balance toward the back. Add to that the weight of the motor and fuel and we have a potential problem. So far, Ive been assuming symmetrical bow and stern as many barge boats feature, but in order to increase buoyancy in back and shift the center of buoyancy forward, I can reduce the rake in back to get more of the hull in the water there. This explains some of the barge boat that did feature a smaller stern rake. How would I go about calculating that? That is something I will have to think about.
But as an interesting exercise, I can calculate the waterline height as a function of the rake angles, length and width of the boat, and overall loaded weight of the boat.
I had to go back to my algebra and trigonometry reference books to look up how tangent and the quadratic equation worked. The last equation gives us the waterline height hw as a function of
Simply put, the total volume of water displaced is equal to the sum of the water displaced by the bow, stern, and center. The volume of each of these can be calculated geometrically as a function of our unknown, the height of the waterline.w = overall width/beam
l = overall length
h = height from bottom to deck (or to the top of the rake)
?b = angle of bow rake
?s = angle of stern rake
Vw = volume at waterline (= the weight of the displacement of loaded boat)
We then solve for the unknown and get an equation in a quadratic form (the forth one from the bottom). So we use the quadradic equation (which Ive always hated) to solve for hw.
Taking our equation for a spin
Lets say the total weight of the boat plus gear plus people plus 25% safety margin is 7000 lbs. Then the calculated volume of the boat at the waterline is 193,846 cu in.Well say the boat is 8 foot (96 inches) wide, the length is 20 foot (240 inches), and the height from the bottom to the deck is 2 feet (24 inches). The bow rake angle is 45° and the stern rake is a modest 10°.
So plugging in the numbers, and taking the plus-or-minus of the quadratic formula into account, I get:
So either my boat will have a waterline 31 feet above the keel (that is to say, the boat will be underwater), or it will float 9 inches out of the water. No wonder I always dreaded the math part of a real-world problem.hw = 370 inches or -9.28 inches
Checking my math... ah I forgot a negative sign! New solutions:
Thats much better. If we throw out the negative solution, we have a waterline 9 and a quarter inches above the keel. Cool.hw = 9.28 inches or -370 inches















.jpg)
.jpg)
Im a little blown away with how long it took to get the metal work completed. I did have a major set back in that the rough openings for the windows were cut for a four inch radius, and the windows are built using a six inch radius. There are 17 windows in the super structure and the repair consisted of me using my plasma cutter to cut out the 68 corners out of the existing rough openings. I then cut 68 new radius corners and welded them back in to the openings. The windows in the salon were easy as they were all square. The windows in the pilot house were a bit more of a challenges as they are all parallelograms, and required a little bit of noggin work to get the angles along with the radiuss correct. But, the window openings are now correct and all the widows fit the way theyre supposed to. Along with repairing the window openings, I added 60 or 70 more tabs to the window openings to bolt framing lumber to.
We have a shower for the cabins below deck, but due to the size of my posse, I felt it best if we had another shower on board. The easiest place to do this was on the aft deck in the port side corner of deck on the salon bulkhead. This will be a hot/cold shower. I fabricated a stainless shelf with a lip on it to retain soap, and a bar for wash rags and to hold back shampoo bottles.
On the aft salon bulkhead on the aft deck the fuel fills and vents reside. There is a two inch fill on both the port and starboard side. Next to each fill are the vents for the two port side tanks and two starboard tanks. The fill and vent pipes are welded in place. I really need a box around each set of pipes, similar to what Peter did on Koala ( now Kame Hele... not sure of the spelling). I have a little bit of time left where I can fabricated these boxs, and I might try braking them over the work bench. If not, my neighbor will do it on his press brake.
I welded the six inch vent intakes for the master cabin. These vents are in the foreword wall of the wheel house.
I was going to get fancy and use a torsion spring to have the ladder self stow up on the roof, but my short time frame killed that idea and I decide to stow the ladder on stainless post welded to the front of the wheel house. The forward rake of the wheel house windows along with the almost 5 distance to the Portuguese bridge will allow all to pass by this area without bumping the ladder. It will make more sense once the super structure is welded to the hull. 
